Dependency management is one of the features of Maven that is best known to users and is one of the areas where Maven excels. There is not much difficulty in managing dependencies for a single a project, but when you start getting into dealing with multi-module projects and applications that consist of tens or hundreds of modules this is where Maven can help you a great deal in maintaining a high degree of control and stability.
Learn more about:
Transitive dependencies are a new feature in Maven 2.0. This allows you to avoid needing to discover and specify the libraries that your own dependencies require, and including them automatically.
This feature is facilitated by reading the project files of your dependencies from the remote repositories specified. In general, all dependencies of those projects are used in your project, as are any that the project inherits from its parents, or from its dependencies, and so on.
There is no limit to the number of levels that dependencies can be gathered from, and will only cause a problem if a cyclic dependency is discovered.
With transitive dependencies, the graph of included libraries can quickly grow quite large. For this reason, there are some additional features that will limit which dependencies are included:
Dependency scope is used to limit the transitivity of a dependency, and also to affect the classpath used for various build tasks.
There are 6 scopes available:
Each of the scopes (except for import) affects transitive dependencies in different ways, as is demonstrated in the table below. If a dependency is set to the scope in the left column, transitive dependencies of that dependency with the scope across the top row will result in a dependency in the main project with the scope listed at the intersection. If no scope is listed, it means the dependency will be omitted.
compile | provided | runtime | test | |
compile | compile(*) | - | runtime | - |
provided | provided | - | provided | - |
runtime | runtime | - | runtime | - |
test | test | - | test | - |
(*) Note: it is intended that this should be runtime scope instead, so that all compile dependencies must be explicitly listed - however, there is the case where the library you depend on extends a class from another library, forcing you to have available at compile time. For this reason, compile time dependencies remain as compile scope even when they are transitive.
The dependency management section is a mechanism for centralizing dependency information. When you have a set of projects that inherits a common parent it's possible to put all information about the dependency in the common POM and have simpler references to the artifacts in the child POMs. The mechanism is best illustrated through some examples. Given these two POMs which extend the same parent:
Project A:
<project> ... <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>group-a</groupId> <artifactId>artifact-a</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> <exclusions> <exclusion> <groupId>group-c</groupId> <artifactId>excluded-artifact</artifactId> </exclusion> </exclusions> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>group-a</groupId> <artifactId>artifact-b</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> <type>bar</type> <scope>runtime</scope> </dependency> </dependencies> </project>
Project B:
<project> ... <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>group-c</groupId> <artifactId>artifact-b</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> <type>war</type> <scope>runtime</scope> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>group-a</groupId> <artifactId>artifact-b</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> <type>bar</type> <scope>runtime</scope> </dependency> </dependencies> </project>
These two example POMs share a common dependency and each has one non-trivial dependency. This information can be put in the parent POM like this:
<project> ... <dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>group-a</groupId> <artifactId>artifact-a</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> <exclusions> <exclusion> <groupId>group-c</groupId> <artifactId>excluded-artifact</artifactId> </exclusion> </exclusions> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>group-c</groupId> <artifactId>artifact-b</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> <type>war</type> <scope>runtime</scope> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>group-a</groupId> <artifactId>artifact-b</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> <type>bar</type> <scope>runtime</scope> </dependency> </dependencies> </dependencyManagement> </project>
And then the two child poms would become much simpler:
<project> ... <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>group-a</groupId> <artifactId>artifact-a</artifactId> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>group-a</groupId> <artifactId>artifact-b</artifactId> <!-- This is not a jar dependency, so we must specify type. --> <type>bar</type> </dependency> </dependencies> </project>
<project> ... <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>group-c</groupId> <artifactId>artifact-b</artifactId> <!-- This is not a jar dependency, so we must specify type. --> <type>war</type> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>group-a</groupId> <artifactId>artifact-b</artifactId> <!-- This is not a jar dependency, so we must specify type. --> <type>bar</type> </dependency> </dependencies> </project>
NOTE: In two of these dependency references, we had to specify the <type/> element. This is because the minimal set of information for matching a dependency reference against a dependencyManagement section is actually {groupId, artifactId, type, classifier}. In many cases, these dependencies will refer to jar artifacts with no classifier. This allows us to shorthand the identity set to {groupId, artifactId}, since the default for the type field is jar, and the default classifier is null.
A second, and very important use of the dependency management section is to control the versions of artifacts used in transitive dependencies. As an example consider these projects:
Project A:
<project> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <groupId>maven</groupId> <artifactId>A</artifactId> <packaging>pom</packaging> <name>A</name> <version>1.0</version> <dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>test</groupId> <artifactId>a</artifactId> <version>1.2</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>test</groupId> <artifactId>b</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> <scope>compile</scope> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>test</groupId> <artifactId>c</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> <scope>compile</scope> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>test</groupId> <artifactId>d</artifactId> <version>1.2</version> </dependency> </dependencies> </dependencyManagement> </project>
Project B:
<project> <parent> <artifactId>A</artifactId> <groupId>maven</groupId> <version>1.0</version> </parent> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <groupId>maven</groupId> <artifactId>B</artifactId> <packaging>pom</packaging> <name>B</name> <version>1.0</version> <dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>test</groupId> <artifactId>d</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> </dependency> </dependencies> </dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>test</groupId> <artifactId>a</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> <scope>runtime</scope> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>test</groupId> <artifactId>c</artifactId> <scope>runtime</scope> </dependency> </dependencies> </project>
When maven is run on project B version 1.0 of artifacts a, b, c, and d will be used regardless of the version specified in their pom.
The reference information about the dependency management tags is available from the project descriptor reference.
The features defined in this section are only available in Maven 2.0.9 or later. This means that poms declaring the import scope will not be parseable by earlier versions of Maven. Weigh this information carefully before deciding to use it. If you do use it, we suggest you use the enforcer plugin to require a minimum Maven version of 2.0.9.
The examples in the previous section describe how to specify managed dependencies through inheritence. However, in larger projects it may be impossible to accomplish this since a project can only inherit from a single parent. To accommodate this, projects can import managed dependencies from other projects. This is accomplished by declaring a pom artifact as a dependency with a scope of "import".
Project B:
<project> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <groupId>maven</groupId> <artifactId>B</artifactId> <packaging>pom</packaging> <name>B</name> <version>1.0</version> <dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>maven</groupId> <artifactId>A</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> <type>pom</type> <scope>import</scope> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>test</groupId> <artifactId>d</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> </dependency> </dependencies> </dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>test</groupId> <artifactId>a</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> <scope>runtime</scope> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>test</groupId> <artifactId>c</artifactId> <scope>runtime</scope> </dependency> </dependencies> </project>
Assuming A is the pom defined in the preceding example, the end result would be the same. All of A's managed dependencies would be incorporated into B except for d since it is defined in this pom.
Project X:
<project> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <groupId>maven</groupId> <artifactId>X</artifactId> <packaging>pom</packaging> <name>X</name> <version>1.0</version> <dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>test</groupId> <artifactId>a</artifactId> <version>1.1</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>test</groupId> <artifactId>b</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> <scope>compile</scope> </dependency> </dependencies> </dependencyManagement> </project>
Project Y:
<project> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <groupId>maven</groupId> <artifactId>Y</artifactId> <packaging>pom</packaging> <name>Y</name> <version>1.0</version> <dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>test</groupId> <artifactId>a</artifactId> <version>1.2</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>test</groupId> <artifactId>c</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> <scope>compile</scope> </dependency> </dependencies> </dependencyManagement> </project>
Project Z:
<project> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <groupId>maven</groupId> <artifactId>Z</artifactId> <packaging>pom</packaging> <name>Z</name> <version>1.0</version> <dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>maven</groupId> <artifactId>X</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> <type>pom</type> <scope>import</scope> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>maven</groupId> <artifactId>Y</artifactId> <version>1.0</version> <type>pom</type> <scope>import</scope> </dependency> </dependencies> </dependencyManagement> </project>
In the example above Z imports the managed dependencies from both X and Y. However, both X and Y contain dependency a. Here, version 1.1 of a would be used since X is declared first and a is not declared in Z's dependencyManagement.
This process is recursive. For example, if X imports another pom, Q, when Z is processed it will simply appear that all of Q's managed dependencies are defined in X.
Imports are most effective when used for defining a "library" of related artifacts that are generally part of a multiproject build. It is fairly common for one project to use one or more artifacts from these libraries. However, it has sometimes been difficult to keep the versions in the project using the artifacts in synch with the versions distributed in the library. The pattern below illustrates how a "bill of materials" (BOM) can be created for use by other projects.
The root of the project is the BOM pom. It defines the versions of all the artifacts that will be created in the library. Other projects that wish to use the library should import this pom into the dependencyManagement section of their pom.
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd"> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <groupId>com.test</groupId> <artifactId>bom</artifactId> <version>1.0.0</version> <packaging>pom</packaging> <properties> <project1Version>1.0.0</project1Version> <project2Version>1.0.0</project2Version> </properties> <dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>com.test</groupId> <artifactId>project1</artifactId> <version>${project1Version}</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>com.test</groupId> <artifactId>project2</artifactId> <version>${project1Version}</version> </dependency> </dependencies> </dependencyManagement> <modules> <module>parent</module> </modules> </project>
The parent subproject has the BOM pom as its parent. It is a normal multiproject pom.
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd"> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <parent> <groupId>com.test</groupId> <version>1.0.0</version> <artifactId>bom</artifactId> </parent> <groupId>com.test</groupId> <artifactId>parent</artifactId> <version>1.0.0</version> <packaging>pom</packaging> <dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>log4j</groupId> <artifactId>log4j</artifactId> <version>1.2.12</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>commons-logging</groupId> <artifactId>commons-logging</artifactId> <version>1.1.1</version> </dependency> </dependencies> </dependencyManagement> <modules> <module>project1</module> <module>project2</module> </modules> </project>
Next are the actual project poms.
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd"> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <parent> <groupId>com.test</groupId> <version>1.0.0</version> <artifactId>parent</artifactId> </parent> <groupId>com.test</groupId> <artifactId>project1</artifactId> <version>${project1Version}</version> <packaging>jar</packaging> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>log4j</groupId> <artifactId>log4j</artifactId> </dependency> </dependencies> </project> <project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd"> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <parent> <groupId>com.test</groupId> <version>1.0.0</version> <artifactId>parent</artifactId> </parent> <groupId>com.test</groupId> <artifactId>project2</artifactId> <version>${project2Version}</version> <packaging>jar</packaging> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>commons-logging</groupId> <artifactId>commons-logging</artifactId> </dependency> </dependencies> </project>
The project that follows shows how the library can now be used in another project without having to specify the dependent project's versions.
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd"> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <groupId>com.test</groupId> <artifactId>use</artifactId> <version>1.0.0</version> <packaging>jar</packaging> <dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>com.test</groupId> <artifactId>bom</artifactId> <version>1.0.0</version> <type>pom</type> <scope>import</scope> </dependency> </dependencies> </dependencyManagement> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>com.test</groupId> <artifactId>project1</artifactId> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>com.test</groupId> <artifactId>project2</artifactId> </dependency> </dependencies> </project>
Finally, when creating projects that import dependencies beware of the following:
Dependencies with the scope system are always available and are not looked up in repository. They are usually used to tell Maven about dependencies which are provided by the JDK or the VM. Thus, system dependencies are especially useful for resolving dependencies on artifacts which are now provided by the JDK, but where available as separate downloads earlier. Typical example are the JDBC standard extensions or the Java Authentication and Authorization Service (JAAS).
A simple example would be:
<project> ... <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>javax.sql</groupId> <artifactId>jdbc-stdext</artifactId> <version>2.0</version> <scope>system</scope> <systemPath>${java.home}/lib/rt.jar</systemPath> </dependency> </dependencies> ... </project>
If your artifact is provided by the JDK's tools.jar the system path would be defined as follows:
<project> ... <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>sun.jdk</groupId> <artifactId>tools</artifactId> <version>1.5.0</version> <scope>system</scope> <systemPath>${java.home}/../lib/tools.jar</systemPath> </dependency> </dependencies> ... </project>